Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2017 г.

Текст

... ion — Action for annulment and for damages — Dismissal of the action as inadmissible at first instance — Rule of correspondence between the application and the complaint — Article 91(2) of the Staff Regulations)

In Case T‑730/15 P,

APPEAL against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 October 2015, DI v EASO (F‑113/13, EU:F:2015:120), seeking to have that order set aside,

DI, residing in Bucharest (Romania), represented by I. Vlaic and G. Iliescu, lawyers,

appellant,

the other party to the proceedings being

European Asylum Support Office (EASO), represented by W. Stevens, acting as Agent, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers,

defendant at first instance,

THE GENERAL COURT (Appeal Chamber),

composed of M. Jaeger, President, M. Prek and A. Dittrich (Rapporteur), Judges,

Registrar: E. Coulon,

gives the following

Judgment

1. By his appeal lodged under Article 9 of Annex I to the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the appellant, Mr DI, seeks to have set aside the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 October 2015, DI v EASO (F‑113/13) (‘the order under appeal’, EU:F:2015:120), by which the Tribunal dismissed his application seeking, first, the annulment of the decision of the Executive Director of the European Asylum Support Office (EASO) of 28 February 2013 to dismiss him at the end of his probationary period (‘the dismissal decision’) and, second, damages for the material and non-material damage allegedly suffered by him and by ...