Дело T-***/**: *****************, Определение от **.**.2020 г.

Текст

... month period laid down in Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations – No excusable error – Manifest inadmissibility)

In Case T‑827/19,

Norbert Gáspár, residing in Mensdorf (Luxembourg), represented by R. Wardyn, lawyer,

applicant,

v

European Commission, represented by B. Mongin and M. Brauhoff, acting as Agents,

defendant,

ACTION brought under Article 270 TFEU, seeking annulment of the decision of the Commission’s Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) of 23 May 2018 confirming the transfer to the pension scheme of the EU institutions of pension rights acquired by the applicant prior to his entry into the service of the European Union,

THE GENERAL COURT (Seventh Chamber),

composed of R. da Silva Passos, President, V. Valančius (Rapporteur) and L. Truchot, Judges,

Registrar: E. Coulon,

makes the following

Order

Background to the dispute

1. The applicant, Mr Norbert Gáspár, worked for the EU institutions as a member of the contract staff from 1 October 2011 to 31 August 2015 before being recruited, on 1 September 2015, as an EU official. In respect of his periods of employment preceding his entry into the service of the European Union, the applicant had acquired pension rights in the national pension schemes of Hungary and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.

2. On 11 December 2017, the applicant requested the transfer of his national pension rights acquired in respect of his periods of employment in Hungary to the pension scheme of the EU institutions (‘the PSEUI’). On the same date, the European Commission’s Office ...