Дело C-317/22: Aziz/ЕСВД, Определение от 19 декември 2022 г.

Текст

... uropean External Action Service (EEAS) – Action directed against the express rejection of the request for access to documents – Admissibility – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Sufficiently clear and precise statement of the pleas in law relied on – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

In Case C‑317/22 P,

APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 9 May 2022,

Ahmad Aziz, residing in Pietà (Malta), represented by L. Cuschieri, avukat,

appellant,

the other party to the proceedings being:

European External Action Service (EEAS),

defendant at first instance,

THE COURT (Tenth Chamber),

composed of D. Gratsias (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, I. Jarukaitis and Z. Csehi, Judges,

Advocate General: J. Kokott,

Registrar: A. Calot Escobar,

having decided, after hearing the Advocate General, to rule by reasoned order, in accordance with Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court,

makes the following

Order

1. By his appeal, Mr Ahmad Aziz seeks to have set aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 5 May 2022, Aziz v EEAS (T‑808/21, not published, EU:T:2022:283) (‘the order under appeal’), by which the General Court dismissed as manifestly inadmissible his action, based on Article 263 TFEU, seeking annulment of the initial decision of the European External Action Service (EEAS) of 6 December 2021 and of its confirmatory decision of 21 December 2021, by which that service dismissed ...