Дело T-***/**: *****************, Определение от **.**.2025 г.

Текст

... egulations – Request for review of a decision which has become final – No substantial new fact – Inadmissibility )

In Case T‑452/24,

DR, represented by N. Flandin, lawyer,

applicant,

v

European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA), represented by A. Terstegen‑Verhaag and C. Coucke, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer,

defendant,

THE GENERAL COURT (Tenth Chamber),

composed of O. Porchia, President, M. Jaeger (Rapporteur) and S. Verschuur, Judges,

Registrar: V. Di Bucci,

makes the following

Order

1. By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant, DR, seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) of 31 October 2023 rejecting his claim for compensation for the damage which he claimed to have suffered as a result of EIOPA’s unlawful conduct (‘the contested decision’) and, in so far as necessary, of the decision of 24 May 2024 rejecting his complaint (‘the decision rejecting the 2024 complaint’), and, secondly, compensation for the material and non-material damage which he claims to have suffered as a result of that unlawful conduct.

Background to the dispute

2. On 1 August 2017, in view of possibly being recruited to EIOPA, the applicant completed a declaration of conflict of interest, in which he stated that:

– he was the owner and managing director of A, which held 100% of the capital of B and C;

– C was inactive and was due to merge with B;

– A and B (together, ‘the companies at issue’) provided consultancy ...