Дело C-614/23: Schneider/EUIPO, Определение от 30 януари 2024 г.

Текст

... cedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)

In Case C‑614/23 P,

APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 6 October 2023,

Markus Schneider, residing in Bonn (Germany), represented by M. Bergermann and D. Graetsch, Rechtsanwälte,

appellant,

the other parties to the proceedings being:

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO),

defendant at first instance,

Frutaria Innovation, SL, formerly Frutaria Comercial de Frutas y Hortalizas, SL, established in Saragossa (Spain),

intervener at first instance,

THE COURT (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed),

composed of L. Bay Larsen, Vice-President of the Court, P.G. Xuereb and A. Kumin (Rapporteur), Judges,

Registrar: A. Calot Escobar,

having regard to the proposal from the Judge-Rapporteur and after hearing the Advocate General, M. Campos Sánchez-Bordona,

makes the following

Order

1. By his appeal, Mr Markus Schneider asks the Court of Justice to set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 26 July 2023, Schneider v EUIPO – Frutaria Innovation (frutania) (T‑109/22, EU:T:2023:423; ‘the judgment under appeal’), by which the General Court dismissed his action for annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 17 December 2021 (Case R 1058/2017-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Frutaria Innovation, SL, and Mr Schneider.

The request that ...