Дело C-362/24: MHCS/EUIPO и Lidl Stiftung, Определение от 2 октомври 2024 г.

Текст

... re of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency and development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed )

In Case C‑362/24 P,

APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 16 May 2024,

MHCS, established in Épernay (France), represented by O. Vrins, B. Raus and N. Clarembeaux, avocats,

appellant,

the other parties to the proceedings being:

Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG, established in Neckarsulm (Germany),

applicant at first instance,

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO),

defendant at first instance,

THE COURT (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed)

composed of L. Bay Larsen, Vice-President of the Court, N. Piçarra and N. Jääskinen (Rapporteur), Judges,

Registrar: A. Calot Escobar,

having regard to the proposal from the Judge-Rapporteur and after hearing the Advocate General, J. Richard de la Tour,

makes the following

Order

1. By its appeal, MHCS asks the Court to set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 6 March 2024, Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO – MHCS (Shade of the colour orange) (T‑652/22, ‘the judgment under appeal’, EU:T:2024:152), by which the General Court annulled the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 16 August 2022 (Case R 118/2022‑4), in relation to invalidity proceedings between Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG and MHCS.

The request that the appeal be allowed to ...