Дело C-577/24: Peikko Group/EUIPO, Определение от 8 януари 2025 г.

Текст

... re of the Court of Justice – Request not demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed )

In Case C‑577/24 P,

APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 29 August 2024,

Peikko Group Oy, established in Lahti (Finland), represented by P. Eskola, asianajaja,

appellant,

the other parties to the proceedings being:

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO),

defendant at first instance,

Anstar Oy, established in Villähde (Finland),

intervener at first instance,

THE COURT (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed),

composed of T. von Danwitz, Vice-President of the Court, A. Kumin and I. Ziemele (Rapporteur), Judges,

Registrar: A. Calot Escobar,

having regard to the proposal from the Judge-Rapporteur and after hearing the Advocate General, T. Ćapeta,

makes the following

Order

1. By its appeal, Peikko Group Oy asks the Court of Justice to set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 26 June 2024, Peikko Group v EUIPO – Anstar (Shape of metal beams for construction) (T‑192/23, EU:T:2024:420; ‘the judgment under appeal’), by which the General Court dismissed its action for annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 7 February 2023 (Case R 2180/2021-5), concerning invalidity proceedings between Peikko Group and Anstar Oy.

The request that the appeal be allowed to proceed

2. Under the first paragraph ...