Дело C-303/25: May/Schweppes International и EUIPO, Определение от 11 ноември 2025 г.

Текст

... cedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed )

In Case C‑303/25 P,

APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 24 April 2025,

May OOO, established in Fryazino (Russia), represented by M. Knitter, Rechtsanwältin,

appellant,

the other parties to the proceedings being:

Schweppes International Ltd, established in London (United Kingdom),

applicant at first instance,

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO),

defendant at first instance,

THE COURT (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed),

composed of T. von Danwitz, Vice-President of the Court, S. Rodin and N. Piçarra (Rapporteur), Judges,

Registrar: A. Calot Escobar,

having regard to the proposal from the Judge-Rapporteur and after hearing the Advocate General, M. Szpunar,

makes the following

Order

1. By its appeal, May OOO seeks to have set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 26 February 2025, Schweppes International v EUIPO – May (MAY TEA) (T‑1066/23 to T‑1069/23, EU:T:2025:181; ‘the judgment under appeal’), by which the General Court annulled the decisions of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 August 2023 (Cases R 72/2022-1, R 77/2022-1, R 75/2022-1 and R 73/2022-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between May and Schweppes International Ltd.

The request that the appeal be allowed to proceed

2. Under the first ...