Дело T-***/**: *****************, Определение от **.**.2020 г.

Текст

In Case T-842/19,

Koopman International BV, established in Amsterdam (Netherlands), represented by G. van den Bergh and B. Brouwer, lawyers,

applicant,

v

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent,

defendant,

the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court, being

Tinnus Enterprises LLC, established in Plano, Texas (United States), represented by A. Odle, lawyer,

the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO being

Mystic Products Import & Export, SL, established in Badalona (Spain),

ACTION brought against the provisional decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 18 September 2019 (Case R 1010/2018-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Mystic Products Import & Export and Koopman International, on the one hand, and Tinnus Enterprises, on the other hand,

THE GENERAL COURT (Tenth Chamber),

composed of A. Kornezov, President, E. Buttigieg (Rapporteur) and K. Kowalik-Bańczyk, Judges,

Registrar: E. Coulon,

having regard to the application lodged at the Court Registry on 10 December 2019,

having regard to the plea of inadmissibility raised by EUIPO by document lodged at the Court Registry on 27 February 2020,

having regard to the response of the intervener lodged at the Court Registry on 10 February 2020,

having regard to the observations of the intervener on the plea of ...