Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2022 г.

Текст

... 2a of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Rejection of the request – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Reasonable time – Liability)

In Case T‑425/20,

KU, represented by A. Tymen, lawyer,

applicant,

v

European External Action Service (EEAS), represented by S. Marquardt, R. Spáč, G. Pasqualetti and E. Orgován, acting as Agents,

defendant,

ACTION under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the EEAS of 17 September 2019 rejecting the applicant’s request for assistance and, secondly, compensation for the harm which she claims to have suffered as a result of psychological harassment,

THE GENERAL COURT (Eighth Chamber),

composed of J. Svenningsen, President, C. Mac Eochaidh and J. Laitenberger (Rapporteur), Judges,

Registrar: I. Pollalis, Administrator,

having regard to the written part of the procedure and further to the hearing on 9 November 2021,

gives the following

Judgment

Background to the dispute

1. On 16 October 2016, the applicant, KU, joined the [confidential] division of the European External Action Service (EEAS), as a member of the contract staff, for a period of 12 months with the possibility of renewal.

2. In [confidential], the applicant contacted the trade union representatives and the EEAS mediator regarding her working conditions and alleged harassment. On [confidential], a meeting between the applicant, the trade union representatives and A, her head of division, was organised.

3. In [confidential], the applicant received an email telling her that her contract would be ...