Дело C-503/24: Puma/EUIPO, Определение от 4 октомври 2024 г.

Текст

... edure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed )

In Case C‑503/24 P,

APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 18 July 2024,

Puma SE, established in Herzogenaurach (Germany), represented by M. Schunke and P. Trieb, Rechtsanwälte,

appellant,

the other party to the proceedings being:

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO),

defendant at first instance,

THE COURT (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed)

composed of L. Bay Larsen, Vice-President of the Court, O. Spineanu-Matei and S. Rodin (Rapporteur), Judges,

Registrar: A. Calot Escobar,

having regard to the proposal from the Judge-Rapporteur and after hearing the Advocate General, N. Emiliou

makes the following

Order

1. By its appeal, Puma SE asks the Court of Justice to set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 8 May 2024, Puma v EUIPO – Fujian Daocheng Electronic Commerce (Footwear) (T‑758/22, EU:T:2024:292; ‘the judgment under appeal’), by which the General Court dismissed the appellant’s action for annulment of the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 21 September 2022 (Case R 1876/2021-3), concerning invalidity proceedings between Puma SE and Fujian Daocheng Electronic Commerce Co. Ltd.

The request that the appeal be allowed to proceed

2. Under the first paragraph of Article 58a of ...