Дело C-46/25: Butzkies-Schiemann/EUIPO, Определение от 17 юни 2025 г.

Текст

... re of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed )

In Case C‑46/25 P,

APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 23 January 2025,

Sven Butzkies-Schiemann, residing in Büdelsdorf (Germany), represented by H.J. Haeseler and T. Honka, Rechtsanwälte,

appellant,

the other parties to the proceedings being:

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO),

defendant at first instance,

U.S. Corrosion Technologies LLC, established in Garland (United States),

intervener at first instance,

THE COURT (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed)

composed of T. von Danwitz, Vice-President of the Court, N. Jääskinen and A. Arabadjiev (Rapporteur), Judges,

Registrar: A. Calot Escobar,

having regard to the proposal from the Judge-Rapporteur and after hearing the Advocate General, D. Spielmann,

makes the following

Order

1. By his appeal, Mr Sven Butzkies-Schiemann seeks to have set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 13 November 2024, Butzkies-Schiemann v EUIPO – U.S. Corrosion Technologies (CorrosionX) (T‑1127/23, ‘the judgment under appeal’, EU:T:2024:812), by which the General Court dismissed his action for annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 15 September 2023 (Case R 1795/2022-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between U.S. Corrosion Technologies LLC and Mr Butzkies-Schiemann.

The request that the appeal be allowed to proceed

2. ...