Дело C-16/25: Finastra International/EUIPO, Определение от 8 юли 2025 г.

Текст

... of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed )

In Case C‑16/25 P,

APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 14 January 2025,

Finastra International Ltd, established in London (United Kingdom), represented by S. Malynicz, Barrister-at-Law,

appellant,

the other parties to the proceedings being:

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO),

defendant at first instance,

Fenestrae BV, established in The Hague (Netherlands),

intervener at first instance,

THE COURT (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed),

composed of T. von Danwitz, Vice-President of the Court, S. Rodin and N. Piçarra (Rapporteur), Judges,

Registrar: A. Calot Escobar,

having regard to the proposal from the Judge-Rapporteur and after hearing the Advocate General, A. Biondi,

makes the following

Order

1. By its appeal, Finastra International Ltd asks the Court of Justice to set aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 4 November 2024, Finastra International v EUIPO – Fenestrae (FINASTRA) (T‑346/23, EU:T:2024:798; ‘the order under appeal’), by which the General Court dismissed its action seeking the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 April 2023 (Case R 1296/2022-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Fenestrae BV and Finastra International.

The request that the appeal be allowed to proceed

2. Under the first paragraph ...