Дело C-***/**: *****************, Определение от **.**.2026 г.

Текст

... ether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed )

In Case C‑851/25 P,

APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 18 December 2025,

Swissgrid AG, established in Aarau (Switzerland), represented by P. De Baere, A. Kavoosi, P. L’Ecluse, V. Lefever and K. T’Syen, avocats,

appellant,

the other parties to the proceedings being:

European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER),

defendant at first instance,

European Commission,

intervener at first instance,

THE COURT (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed),

composed of T. von Danwitz, Vice-President of the Court, O. Spineanu-Matei and N. Fenger (Rapporteur), Judges,

Registrar: A. Calot Escobar,

having regard to the proposal from the Judge-Rapporteur and after hearing the Advocate General, M. Szpunar,

makes the following

Order

1. By its appeal, Swissgrid AG asks the Court of Justice to set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 8 October 2025, Swissgrid v ACER (T‑558/23, ‘the contested judgment’, EU:T:2025:943), by which the General Court dismissed its action for the annulment of Decision A-007-2022 of the Board of Appeal of the European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) of 29 June 2023 dismissing as inadmissible the appeal against ACER’s ...